Media Watch
Call for probe into police after apology to Channel 4
16 May - The Birmingham Post
Town Halls should map race and religion to identify 'tension hotspots', says Hazel Blears
15 May - Daily Mail
Police and CPS apologise to programme makers
15 May - The Guadian
Could I stop being a Muslim?
15 May - BBC Radio 4
Churchgoing on its knees as Christianity falls out of favour
8 May - The Times
'Caste wall' is partly demolished
6 May - BBC News
Teenage Iraqi girl who fell in love with BRITISH soldier in Basra is murdered by her own father in honour killing
29 Apr - Evening Standard
subscribe to Media WatchReuters AlertNet
Bush to discuss Palestinian concerns in talks
U.S. House Leader Nancy Pelosi visits Iraq
Lebanese leaders face hurdles at tense Qatar talks
VIDEO: Death toll soars in Myanmar
North Korea offers $100,000 to China for quake victims
Bangladeshis hold mass prayer for release of ex-PM
PHOTOS: Myanmar cyclone reconstruction begins
INTERVIEW-SARS wake-up call now paying off for China
Latest News
29th October 2007
The central difference
by John Ray
Pope Benedict XVI
The media have missed the point of the letter from 138 Muslim leaders to the Pope on 11 October.
In welcoming the tone of the letter, the Telegraph headline typically reported: “Muslim scholars’ olive branch to Christians.” And Reuters saws it as an “Unprecedented Muslim call for peace with Christians.” But was it really?
The letter cites the Qur’an in calling Christians to ‘Come to a common word between us and you that we shall worship but one God and that we shall ascribe no partner to him.’
Dr Williams, in apparently welcoming the letter in a press release from Lambeth Palace dated 11 October, noted the need for respect and mutual goodwill where Muslims and Christians lived together and where either community was a minority.
But he also referred to the detail of the ‘common word’ saying ‘the letter’s understanding of the unicity of God provided an opportunity for Christians and Muslims to explore together their distinctive understandings and the ways in which these mould and shape our lives.’
He thus put down a careful marker: the basis of unity itself has to be a central point of dialogue as it is a central aspect of religious difference.
Dr Michael Nazir Ali in his initial response commented that the Christian view of God containing Jesus in a divine trinity was very different from that of Muslims. ‘Dialogue should be on the basis of that difference. They appear to be saying “This is what Muslims believe . . . if you agree, then let’s have a dialogue”.’
This overture is too important to be dismissed or ignored, but at the start of dialogue, Christianity cannot be subsumed within Islam. As Christians must understand Muslims, so Muslims must understand Christians. Each faith must say ‘Let me be other’.
The letter – with the caveats already noted and perhaps also without a major omission of the Jewish inclusion - closes the door on the peddlers of hatred and opens it to hard, protracted and essential dialogue.
The ‘common word’ the letter describes is based on two foundational principles of both faiths: love of the one true God and love of the neighbour. It calls Christians, Muslims and other faith communities to ‘vie with each other only in righteousness and good works; to respect each other, be fair, just and kind to one another and to live in sincere peace harmony, and mutual goodwill.’
Translated into all the languages of the persecuted church, this letter with these clear prescriptions sanctioned by the entire Ummah, could be the basis of serious accountability wherever believers are persecuted for their faith.
Now we have to see the action, the cash value of the ‘common word’ at all levels and in five continents.
But can the secular world grasp what’s really at stake? Religious literacy will be increasingly – and unfashionably - obligatory for the future of international relations.
Related Links
Read the scholars’ letter in full
Read Dr Michael Nazir-Ali’s response
Read Dr Rowan Williams’ press release
Lapido Blog
Fitna: not for mice
The Archbishop’s bomb
08 Apr 2008
08 Feb 2008
Downloadable Publications
Ethics in Brief
‘Women have borne the brunt of our failed multi-culturalism’, argues Jenny Taylor in Ethics in Brief Spring 2008 issue
Christianity or Occult?
As cases of kindoki or ‘child witch’ abuse re-surface in Britain, a new downloadable report brings together material by leading African and English scholars from a recent symposium that throws light on some of the allegations.
Featured Publications
Crimes of the Community
A devastating report on the rise of "honour-based" violence against women from immigrant communities in the UK. It is devastating not just because it reveals the complicity of some "community leaders" in killings, attempted murder and beatings, but also because its sources are so authoritative...
Young, British and Muslim
'A most important book on British Muslims. It explodes many contemporary stereotypes to reveal a picture which is far more complex than is often supposed. It shines a light onto both new areas of menace and new avenues of hope. Every politician and policy-maker should read it.'
Paul Vallely, The Independent
Conviction and Conflict
Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali sets out fundamental guidelines on the role of religion in society and its relationship to nationalism, ideology and political institutions, and examines Christian-Muslim dialogue with particular relationship to the rise of Arab, Indian and Turkish nationalism.
Not for Sale
This is a must read for all those seeking to understand the issues surrounding sexual exploitation and abuse in our society today - the human cost of UK prostitution today and the scourge of trafficking for sexual exploitation exposed to our senses as never before.
More information and Sample Chapters »